Trash Trivia Quiz
It’s been two months since the start of the new service. Here’s your chance to show just how much you’ve learned during that time. Send me an email (uapetition@aol.com) with your answers to the quiz by midnight of Sunday, June 8. The winner, to be announced on Wednesday, June 11, will win a free “UA Reserve Note” (i.e. trash sticker). In the case of a tie, the first 3 winning entries (as determined by date/time of email) will receive a sticker.
All of the multiple choice questions are worth a point each and come straight from this website. The bonus questions are also worth one point each, and can be found through an Internet search.
If anything is unclear, just email me. Good Luck!
1. The ability to call the solid waste division and change your pick up day if you are going on vacation.
2. The ability to order “rollout” dumpsters for temporary use (e.g. if you are moving and want to clean house).
3. The ability to have your trash, recyclables, and yard waste picked up garage-side if you are temporarily incapacitated (e.g. if you break your leg).
(a): Just (1) is not now offered. Perks (2) and (3) are still offered.
(b): Just (3) is not now offered. Perks (1) and (2) are still offered.
(c): You can still get all of these with the new service.
(d): You can’t get any of these with the new service. There were a host of services that were included under the old service that aren't included in the new contract. And if they aren't in the contract, the city can't ask for them without paying more money.
(a): Terms in the agreement with city workers that prevented the City from making “major solid waste division staff changes” after this date. These terms did indeed exist.
(b): Expiration dates in the proposals submitted by the three bidders. These dates did indeed exist.
(c): Terms in the agreement with city workers that prevented the City from making “major solid waste division staff changes” after this date. These terms did NOT exist. City Council was misled into thinking something had to be done by the end of 2007. This was not true. Actually, it was the opposite. None of the solid waste personnel could be laid off until after January 1, 2008. What is of concern is that the City Manager, who was a signatory on the agreement and must have known this, sat in silence while the Assistant City Manager made this statement.
(d): Expiration dates in the proposals submitted by the three bidders. These dates did NOT exist.
(a): Garage-side or door-side.
(b): Curb-side.
(c): The contract does not specify. This is causing a problem. For the last two months city employees (NOT the contractor) have been picking up recyclables and yard waste for persons with medical exemptions, and we've been paying for that. If the city wants them to be picked up garage-side by the contractor, chances are it will have to pay extra, further eroding the cost savings.
(a): The addition of important contract stipulations.
(b): A change in the authorized expenditure level.
(c): A change in start date for the new service.
(d): The use of the “emergency clause” to prevent a vote by the residents. The city was determined that residents would have no say whatsoever in this decision. There was absolutely nothing that happened between those dates to cause this to be an "emergency."
(a): True/True
(b): True/False
(c): False/True
(d): False/False This is a true concern. Even though during one of the pre-award meetings, the contractor agreed to put this clause in the contract, the city neglected to do so. The city is now impotent to insure the safety of its residents, much less to enforce ordinance 507.18, that prohibits convicted sexual predators from living or working within 1000 feet of any school, preschool, daycare facility, public park, swimming pool, library, or playground.
(a): Exists if commercial garbage trucks are on the streets between the hours of 7:00 PM and 7:30 AM.
(b): Is considered to be a misdemeanor of the fourth degree.
(c): Interferes with the comfortable enjoyment of life, property and recreation due to excessive noise levels.
(d): All of the above. To date, the contractor has been exempted each and every day from complying with this ordinance, yet has held other haulers and workers accountable.
(a): $5 million/$5 million
(b): $2.5 million/$2.5 million
(c): $2.5 million/$1 million
(d): $2.5 million/$211,000 Half of the claimed savings was due to the change from garage-side to curb-side service. Keeping garage-side service would have amounted to a mere $39.00 extra per household. The other $2.5 million in claimed savings was not there. Significant mistakes made by the city Finance Director in its bid analysis, favoring the contractor scenario. Considering the extra expense that has been incurred due to the use of additional city resources since contract start, it is likely that we are now paying more with the new service.
(a): Taken care of by the city employees … the resident’s responsibility, because the contract does not state how it is to be disposed of by the contractor. The city neglected to put any stipulations into the contract regarding how used motor oil would be treated. Under the old service, it was picked up and trasnported to the city's garage, where it was recycled. Under the new service, residents have seen contractor personnel dumping the used motor oil into the garbage truck which is destined for the landfill.
(b): The resident’s responsibility … the resident’s responsibility, because the contract does not state how it is to be disposed of by the contractor.
(c): Taken care of by the city employees … taken care of by the contractor,
(d): The resident’s responsibility … taken care of by the contractor.
(a): $15.00/$50,000
(b): $33.50/$100,000
(c): $50.00/$150,000
(d): $75.00/$225,000 I was wrong on this due to the increase in paper prices. Actually, each ton of paper that is diverted from the recycling station to the landfill currently costs the city $106.00 ($33.50 landfill charges avoided, plus $72.50 paid by the recycler to the city). Historically, the city has generated approximately 80 tons per week. At current paper prices, this means a savings of $440,000 per year.
(a): 10% /10%
(b): 10%/15% This is approximately 1400 and 2100 signatures, respectively.
(c): 15%/10%
(d): 15%/15%
Bonus Questions